Cases 31 - 40 of 145
Anderson v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00074
Defendant:
Candy Davis, David Bowling, Marty Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Boyd et al
as 3:2020cv00067
Defendant:
Kieth Bowls and Marty Boyd
Plaintiff:
Marvin Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. et al
as 0:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rentz, Karla Jo Rentz, Amanda Calhoun Rentz and others
Defendant:
Robinson Fresh, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Company and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00909
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore et al v. Agropecario Los Americanos S.C. de R.L. de C.V. et al
as 4:2020cv00252
Plaintiff:
Amanda Calhoun Rentz, Jason Lusk, CA Comerical, S.A.C. and others
Defendant:
Robinson Fresh, C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc., C.H. Robinson Company and others
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Hartman et al v. Bowles
as 4:2019cv02963
Plaintiff:
Ryan Hartman and James Hartman
Defendant:
Beary Bowles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bern et al v. Monsanto Company
as 4:2019cv02342
Plaintiff:
Joseph Malak, Michael Woolley, Danette Lampkin and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strosnider et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02139
Plaintiff:
Robert Mauer, Paul Perdue, Hugh Powell and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Nessmith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02081
Plaintiff:
James Bowles, Allan Euroza, Daniel Yoon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Randy Davidson v. Village of Freistatt, et al
as 19-2218
Defendant / Appellee:
Debrorah Shoen, in her official and individual capacities, James Ortwein, in his official and individual capacities, Village of Freistatt and others
Plaintiff:
Bonnie Davidson, Travis Doran and Mark Reyes
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Randy Davidson
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
