Cases 31 - 40 of 69
Hewitt v. Berryhill
as 0:2017cv05143
Plaintiff:
Karen S. Hewitt
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00874
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hicks et al v. St. Louis County Police Department et al
as 4:2017cv01495
Plaintiff:
Rachel Michele Hicks and M.R.H.
Defendant:
St. Louis County Police Department, Aaron Dilks, John Wheeler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reddick et al v. Gynecare, Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv01462
Plaintiff:
Wanda Reddick , Susan Hewitt , Nereida Hernandez and others
Defendant:
Gynecare, Inc., Ethicon, Inc., Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robinson v. Atkins et al
as 4:2016cv00548
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
A Atkins, Scott Thomasee, D Armant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harry Campbell, III v. Mike Sharp, et al
as 16-1865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Harry G. Campbell, III
Defendant - Appellee:
Mike Sharp, Jackson County Sheriff, Jane Doe #1, Jackson County Deputy Sheriff, John Doe #1, Jackson County Deputy Sheriff and others
Campbell v. Sharp et al
as 4:2015cv00745
Plaintiff:
Harry G Campbell, III
Defendant:
Mike Sharp, Jane Doe # 1, John Doe #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell et al v. Fayetteville Public Schools et al
as 5:2015cv05161
Plaintiff:
Chris D. Ezell , James Lyles , Donna Lyles and others
Defendant:
Fayetteville Public Schools , Paul Hewitt and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Pippin v. Rockteen CP, LLC et al
as 5:2015cv05123
Plaintiff:
Charles Pippin
Defendant:
Rocktenn CP, LLC and AON Hewitt, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hewitt v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
as 0:2015cv01924
Plaintiff:
Norman Craig Hewitt
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
