Cases 31 - 40 of 97
Helloms v. McDaniel et al
as 5:2019cv00146
Defendant:
Adam Vick, Anthony Lugo, Ivory T McDaniel and others
Plaintiff:
Charles D Helloms
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love v. Kelley
as 5:2018cv00176
Defendant:
Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Ivory Joe Love
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv04104
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Thompson v. McDaniel et al
as 2:2018cv00049
Plaintiff:
Ernest W L Thompson
Defendant:
Ivory T McDaniel, S Chapman and Jermy Sykes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ivory v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2017cv02678
Plaintiff:
Timothy M. Ivory
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Gray et al v. Coleman et al
as 2:2017cv00188
Plaintiff:
Randle Foran, Roger Wilkison, Stanley Bartlett and others
Defendant:
Turner Commodities Inc, Steven Michael Keith, Jr, Neauman Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Penn Brothers Partnership et al v. Penn et al
as 3:2017cv00251
Defendant:
Neauman Coleman & Co - LLC, Turner Commodities Inc, Neauman Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph H Penn, James M Penn and Penn Brothers Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reid & Lynn Grizzle Partnership et al v. K B X Inc et al
as 2:2017cv00151
Plaintiff:
Reid & Lynn Grizzle Partnership , Reid Grizzle , Lynn Grizzle and others
Defendant:
K B X Inc , Ivory Rice LLC , Agribusiness Properties LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oakley Grain Inc et al v. Department of Agriculture et al
as 2:2017mc00001
Plaintiff:
Oakley Grain Inc and Bruce Oakley Inc
Defendant:
Department of Agriculture , Commodity Credit Corporation , Turner Grain Merchandising Inc and others
Ivory v. Frasure et al
as 4:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Robert L Ivory, II
Defendant:
Jamal Diamonte Frasure, Middleton and Turnetine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
