Cases 31 - 40 of 87
Lovins v. Korte et al
as 4:2016cv00765
Plaintiff:
Cindy Lovins
Defendant:
Stephen Korte, Josh Baker, Josh Langley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00078
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Amanda Langley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Davis v. Jomp, et al.
as 4:2016cv00229
Plaintiff:
Frederick P. Davis
Defendant:
Sandra Boylan, Doris Brooks, Gayle Ellerbeck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langley v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv00161
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Amanda Langley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Ross v. Langley et al
as 4:2015cv00295
Plaintiff:
Randolph Ross
Defendant:
Linda Langley, Meredith Baker and Chad Squires
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
William Eugene Langley
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs , Wendy Kelley , Larry Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hopkins v. Christian Homes, Inc. et al
as 4:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
Glenn Joseph Hopkins
Defendant:
Christian Homes, Inc., Timothy Phillippe, Lewis Memorial Christian Village and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Mauricio Rueben v. T.C. Outlaw, et al
as 14-3819
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mauricio Rueben
Defendant - Appellee:
T. C. Outlaw, Warden, FCI - Forrest City, DW Heuett, Assistant Warden, FCI - Forrest City, William Resto, Clinical Director, FCI - Forrest City and others
Campbell v. Watson et al
as 6:2014cv06135
Plaintiff:
Steven J. Campbell
Defendant:
Jason Watson , Larry Cain , Ben Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeffery Crawford v. Nader Peikar, et al
as 14-3173
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeffery Lamar Crawford
Defendant - Appellee:
Nader Peikar, Doctor, Federal Correctional Complex, Mary Ellen Rivers-Graham, Brenda Hoy, "AHSA" Assistance Health Service Assistance, Federal Correctional Complex and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
