Cases 31 - 40 of 45
McMahan v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv05127
Plaintiff:
Pamela McMahan
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Purifoy v. Bauxite, City of et al
as 4:2012cv00742
Plaintiff:
Deborah Purifoy
Defendant:
Bauxite, City of, Michael Ray Turner, Ron Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Turner v. Farnham et al
as 5:2012cv06060
Plaintiff:
Terry Mason Turner
Defendant:
Milo Farnham, Phillip Dean, David Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMahan v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. et al
as 0:2011cv02764
Plaintiff:
Paul McMahan
Defendant:
Takeda Pharmaceuticals America, Inc. , Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. , Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv02324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
McMahan v. United States of America
as 4:2010cv00944
Petitioner:
Daniel R. McMahan
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States v. Daniel McMahan
as 09-1218
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel R. McMahan
McMahan v. Astrue
as 6:2008cv03300
Plaintiff:
Daniel A. McMahan
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
McMahan et al v. Franklin County Adult Detention Facility et al
as 4:2008cv00406
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. McMahan and Shawn H. Scrivens
Defendant:
Franklin County Adult Detention Facility, Unknown Toelke, Unknown Boehm and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McMahan v. Franklin County Sheriff's Dept. et al
as 4:2007cv01154
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. McMahan
Defendant:
Franklin County Sheriff's Dept., Franklin County Jail, Unknown Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
