Cases 31 - 40 of 517
Hall v. Payne
as 4:2022cv00457
Plaintiff:
Neal Hall and Neil Allen Hall
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howland v. Stange
as 1:2022cv00057
Plaintiff:
Neil Howland
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neil Bergeson, Jr. v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 22-1318
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neil Dennis Bergeson, Jr., a state citizen
Defendant / Appellee:
State of South Dakota, Judge Cullen Parker McNeece, Dylan Kirchmeirier and others
Clem v. Counts et al
as 4:2022cv00195
Plaintiff:
Neil Clem
Defendant:
Anthony Counts, Holden Lester, Darren White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polk v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Ryan Neil Polk
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Neil Bergeson, Jr. v. State of South Dakota, et al
as 21-3926
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Neil Dennis Bergeson, Jr., a state citizen
Defendant / Appellee:
State of South Dakota, Judge Cullen Parker McNeece, Dylan Kirchmeirier and others
McGinnis v. North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations et al
as 1:2021cv00215
Plaintiff:
Neil Adams McGinnis
Defendant:
North Dakota Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations, Mr. David Krabbenhoft, Mr. Colby Braun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Staley et al
as 4:2021cv00899
Plaintiff:
Neil Clem and Justin R Bryant
Defendant:
John Staley and Kristi Flud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Childers v. Staley et al
as 4:2021cv00900
Plaintiff:
Neil Clem and Derrek Childers
Defendant:
John Staley and Kristi Flud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Staley et al
as 4:2021cv00901
Plaintiff:
Neil Clem and Joshua Phillips
Defendant:
John Staley and Kristi Flud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
