Cases 41 - 50 of 1,437
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
United States v. Jeremy Woods
as 23-3238
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jeremy Ace Woods
Ames v. Ennis et al
as 5:2023cv05171
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Parole Officer Emily Ennis, Mark Bernthal, Brenda Marshal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ames v. Sharp
as 5:2023cv05167
Plaintiff:
Donald Lesley Ames, Jr.
Defendant:
Former Officer James Sharp, Sheriff Shawn Holloway, Parole Officer Emily Ennis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ordoukhanian v. Chaney et al
as 4:2023cv01237
Plaintiff:
Raymond Dean Ordoukhanian
Defendant:
Leah Chaney, Casey Brooks, Ryan J. McCarrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley v. U.S. District Clerk of Court et al
as 4:2023cv00671
Plaintiff:
Gene E Dudley
Defendant:
U.S. District Court Clerk, Gloria Woods and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Woods v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02887
Plaintiff:
Travis Woods
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
McCoy v. Woods et al
as 4:2023cv00869
Plaintiff:
Terry Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Lafayette Woods, Jr, Hudson, Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00643
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rebolloso v. Woods Construction and Development, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jose Raul Rebolloso
Defendant:
Woods Construction and Development, Inc. and Seth Woods
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
