Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Ambrose v. Jett et al
as 0:2013cv02343
Petitioner:
Frank Brian Ambrose
Respondent:
B.R. Jett and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis Paint Company v. C.M. Ambrose Company
as 4:2013cv00662
Plaintiff:
Davis Paint Company
Defendant:
C.M. Ambrose Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Paul v. Maples et al
as 1:2013cv00056
Plaintiff:
Ambrose Gene Paul
Defendant:
John Maples, Jr, Richard Guy, Audrey Weekly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hytrek v. Pottawattamie County, Iowa et al
as 1:2013cv00015
Plaintiff:
John Charles Hytrek
Defendant:
Pottawattamie County, Iowa , Pottawattamie County Sheriff's Office , Jeffery Danker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davidson v. City of Grain Valley, Missouri et al
as 4:2012cv01241
Plaintiff:
Jonathan E Davidson
Defendant:
City of Grain Valley, Missouri and Aaron Ambrose
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Spires v. United States of America
as 4:2012cv00207
Petitioner:
Ambrose Rayshawn Spires
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ambrose v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2012cv03014
Plaintiff:
Glen A. Ambrose
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thompson v. King et al
as 4:2012cv00002
Plaintiff:
Dolly Thompson
Defendant:
Ulenzen King , Ambrose Marvel , Phillip Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. King et al
as 4:2011cv00436
Plaintiff:
Dolly Thompson
Defendant:
Ulenzen King , Ambrose Marvel , Bruce Pennington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Ambrose Spires
as 09-3663
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Ambrose Rayshawn Spires, also known as Ambrose Spries
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
