Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv05077
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Twin Cities Muffler & Brakes, Inc. v. Car-X Service Systems, Inc., et al
as 0:2010cv02570
Plaintiff:
Twin Cities Muffler & Brakes, Inc.
Defendant:
Car-X Service Systems, Inc., Car-X Associates Corp. and Roger Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank Audino Construction Inc v. GCC Alliance Concrete Inc et al
as 5:2010cv04041
Plaintiff:
Frank Audino Construction Inc
Defendant:
GCC Alliance Concrete Inc, Siouxland Concrete Company and Steven K Vande Brake
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Waterman v. VS Holding Company et al
as 5:2010cv04038
Plaintiff:
Randy Waterman
Defendant:
VS Holding Company and Steven K Vande Brake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Walterman v. VS Holding Company et al
as 5:2010cv04039
Plaintiff:
Randy Walterman
Defendant:
VS Holding Company and Steven Keith Vande Brake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
McCall v. Monro Muffler Brake
as 4:2010cv00269
Plaintiff:
John McCall
Defendant:
Monro Muffler Brake
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Brake Landscaping & Lawncare v. Hawkeye-Security Ins. Co., et al
as 09-3874
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Brake Landscaping & Lawncare, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee:
Hawkeye-Security Insurance Company and The Midwestern Indemnity Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brake Resources, Inc v. Carlisle Companies, Incorporated et al
as 4:2009cv00587
Plaintiff:
Brake Resources, Inc
Defendant:
Carlisle Companies, Incorporated and Motion Control Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Smithco Manufacturing Inc v. Haldex Brake Products Corporation
as 5:2009cv04016
Plaintiff:
Smithco Manufacturing Inc
Defendant:
Haldex Brake Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
