Cases 41 - 50 of 662
Hill v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv01201
Plaintiff:
Adam Hill
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, William Straughn, Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arnsperger v. Kent et al
as 5:2022cv05228
Plaintiff:
Daniel E. Arnsperger
Defendant:
Michael Kent, The Happy Group, Inc. and Polzeath Surf Limited
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Christa Spykstra Tesone Trust, et al
as 22-3321
Not Yet Classified:
In re: Christa Annette Spykstra Tesone Trust and Evan Kent Dalrymple Trust
Christa Spykstra Tesone Trust, et al
as 22-3317
Not Yet Classified:
In re: Christa Annette Spykstra Tesone Trust and Evan Kent Dalrymple Trust
Knode v. Rothenberger et al
as 4:2022cv04148
Plaintiff:
Andrew Dwight Knode
Defendant:
Officer Sgt. Monty Rothenberger, Officer Kyler Pekarek, Officer Joseph Erickson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahaffey v. Gentry et al
as 4:2022cv04080
Plaintiff:
Kent Mahaffey
Defendant:
Robert Gentry, Arenar Romona, Deputy Chris Walcott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griffin v. McNutt et al
as 4:2022cv00813
Plaintiff:
Vinson Griffin, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Kent McNutt, Dr. Jerry Lovelace, Angela Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In Re: Christa Annette Spykstra Teson Trust et al
as 0:2022cv01925
In Re:
Christa Annette Spykstra Tesone Trust and Evan Kent Dalrymple Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
In Re: Christa Annette Spykstra Teson Trust et al
as 0:2022cv01926
In Re:
Christa Annette Spykstra Teson Trust, Evan Kent Dalrymple Trust and Christa Annette Spykstra Tesone Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
