Cases 41 - 50 of 2,421
Rock v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00602
Plaintiff:
Stephen Rock
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Tate v. Concentra Health Services, Inc. et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Stephen Tate and Steven Tate
Defendant:
Concentra Health Services, Inc., Select Medical Holdings Corporation and Perry Johnson & Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Greenpoint Ag Holdings, LLC v. McKaskle et al
as 1:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Greenpoint Ag Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Stephen F. McKaskle, M.E.G. Farms, LLC and McKaskle Farms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Power v. Weis
as 1:2024cv00020
Petitioner:
Jerome Power
Respondent:
Stephen Weis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plunkett v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Farland Gilliehan v. St. Charles County Court, et al
as 24-1282
Plaintiff:
Farland L. Gilliehan
Defendant:
St. Charles County Circuit Court, St. Charles County Jail, Dan Keen, St. Charles County Jail Director and others
Allwine v. Bolin
as 0:2024cv00439
Petitioner:
Stephen Allwine
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Parr v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Stephen Parr
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 20101 Railroad Safety
Johnson et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00379
Plaintiff:
Stephen Johnson and Patricia Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
