Cases 51 - 60 of 145
Davidson et al v. Village of Freistatt et al
as 3:2018cv05048
Plaintiff:
Randy Davidson, Bonnie Davidson, Travis Doran and others
Defendant:
Village of Freistatt, Deborah Shoen, Eva Jobe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cummings v. Woodbury County Jail
as 5:2018cv04040
Plaintiff:
Austin Beau Cummings, Trinity Thompson, Kenneth Marcus and others
Defendant:
Woodbury County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowles v. Jackley et al
as 5:2018cv05030
Petitioner:
Wade Elliot Bowles
Respondent:
Marty Jackley and Darin Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SnugglyCat, Inc. v. Opfer Communications, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv03110
Plaintiff:
SnugglyCat, Inc.
Defendant:
Opfer Communications, Inc., Krissy Bernhardi, Chris Louzader and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Clark et al v. AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
as 4:2018cv00149
Plaintiff:
Timothy Clark, Georgia M. Clark and Shanice L. Oliver
Defendant:
AMF Bowling Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arnold v. Sebastian County, Arkansas et al
as 2:2016cv02131
Plaintiff:
Latrelle Arnold
Defendant:
Sebastian County, Arkansas , William Hollenbeck , David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2016cv04041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sykes et al v. Liparoto et al
as 4:2016cv00578
Plaintiff:
Kayan Sykes and K.K.E.
Defendant:
Peter Liparoto, Brett Bowling and Normandy, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Russell et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv00175
Plaintiff:
Opal Russell , Jennifer Angenendt , Jean Bayles and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2015cv00369
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
