Cases 51 - 60 of 351
Johnson v. Doe #1 et al
as 6:2022cv03141
Plaintiff:
Wayne Johnson
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Laliberte v. Doe 1 et al
as 0:2022cv01358
Plaintiff:
David Laliberte
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Does 2-6, John Does 7 and 8 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimbley v. Starr et al
as 2:2022cv02075
Plaintiff:
Paige Cheree Kimbley
Defendant:
Wayne Leslie Starr, John Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Orr v. Lindsey et al
as 3:2022cv05032
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Lynn Orr
Defendant:
Matthew Lindsey, Henson, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Jane or John Doe #1 et al
as 5:2022cv05056
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Jane or John Doe #1, Jane or John Doe #2 and Jane and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe v. Koester et al
as 4:2022cv00301
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Officer Dickerson
Defendant:
Christopher E Koester, Kenneth L. Gregory, Mark D Eberwein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Danner v. Doe 1 et al
as 1:2022cv00020
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Danner
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Graham et al v. Butterball, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02026
Plaintiff:
Chris Graham, Dennis Lassiter and Adam Crowder
Defendant:
Butterball, LLC, Christopher Marr, John Does 1-3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Weinhaus v. Alabseries.com et al
as 4:2022cv00115
Plaintiff:
Edward Coach Weinhaus
Defendant:
ALABSERIES.COM PODCAST, Tarik Faoud Ajami, Andrew Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Danner v. Doe 1 et al
as 6:2022cv03023
Plaintiff:
Nathan Wayne Danner
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and John Doe 3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
