Cases 51 - 60 of 2,237
Fruin v. State of Iowa
as 4:2023cv00513
Petitioner:
Aaron Fruin
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. State of Iowa
as 4:2023cv00514
Petitioner:
David Anthony Jones and David Jones
Respondent:
State of Iowa
Interested Party:
Aaron Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Day v. Ellison et al
as 0:2023cv03826
Plaintiff:
Roger Jerome Day
Defendant:
Keith Ellison, Tim Walz and Dan Ganin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Warriax v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 6:2023cv02094
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms
Plaintiff:
Roger Warriax
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 Supplemental Security Income Benefits (SSID)
Warriax v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2023cv02095
Plaintiff:
Roger Warriax
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1381 Supplemental Security Income Benefits (SSID)
v. Warriax et al
as 6:2023cv02094
Defendant:
Roger Warriax and Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
United States v. Terrance Rogers
as 23-3684
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Terrance Rogers, also known as Unc
Krenning v. Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
as 4:2023cv01594
Plaintiff:
Roger Krenning, Jr.
Defendant:
Progressive Advanced Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. et al v. City of Lowell, Arkansas et al
as 5:2023cv05229
Plaintiff:
Metro Builders Supply, Inc. and Metro Builders Supply of Rogers, Inc.
Defendant:
City of Lowell, Arkansas, Chris Moore, Elizabeth Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-3669
Petitioner / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
