Cases 51 - 60 of 7,591
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00304
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Russell Lindquist v. Vicki Taylor, et al
as 24-1876
Plaintiff:
Russell Floyd Lindquist
Defendant:
Vicki Taylor, individually and officially as Assistant Chief Judge in Dakota County (DC), First Judicial District, Keith M. Ellison, officially as Minnesota Attorney General, Matt Smith, officially as DC Manager and others
Buchanan v. Roberts et al
as 3:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Christopher Buchanan
Defendant:
Roberts, Bata, Thomas Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Willoughby et al
as 4:2024cv00147
Plaintiff:
Anthony Smith
Defendant:
Georgia Willoughby and Bookenott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith v. Summers et al
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Scott Dean Keith
Defendant:
Summers, Smith, DeCastro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Mitchell, II v. Douglas County, et al
as 24-1839
Plaintiff:
David Mitchell, II
Defendant:
Douglas County, a Nebraska Political Subdivision, Donald W. Kleine, in his individual and official capacity as Douglas County Attorney, Douglas County Attorney's Office and others
Finley v. Smith # 168 et al
as 6:2024cv06058
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
W. Smith # 168 and B. Rosburg # 366
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
United States v. Michael Smith
as 24-1789
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Lee Smith
Moody v. Falkenrath et al
as 2:2024cv04057
Plaintiff:
Michael Allen Moody
Defendant:
Doris Falkenrath, Billy Dunbar, Almalee Dittman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
