Cases 51 - 60 of 99
Mick vs. Raines, et al.,
as 5:2014cv06037
Plaintiff:
Kerrie Gene Mick
Defendant:
Wes Raines , Harold Allison , Garrett Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Simms v. Nationstar Mortgage, LLC et al
as 4:2014cv00243
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage, LLC , Federal National Mortgage Association , St. Louis County Department of Revenue and others
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Simms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simms v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC et al
as 4:2013cv01935
Defendant:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Federal National Mortgage Association
Plaintiff:
Michael W. Simms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States v. Mandingo Simm
as 13-2595
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Mandingo Simms
Gage et al v. Martin et al
as 4:2013cv00236
Plaintiff:
Mary Louise Gage and Inez Schuldies
Defendant:
Mary Lucille Martin, Arvid Bean, Loyce Ann Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Zwetzig v. Colvin
as 5:2013cv05026
Plaintiff:
Shannon Simm Zwetzig
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Simms v. Mowry et al
as 4:2013cv00621
Plaintiff:
Corey Robert Simms
Defendant:
Unknown Mowry and Unknown Temptable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henry v. Simms et al
as 4:2013cv00075
Plaintiff:
Roy Henry, Jr
Defendant:
Barry Simms, Haylie Lott, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2012cv03559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Simms et al v. Northport Health Services Of Arkansas, L.L.C. et al
as 2:2012cv02252
Plaintiff:
Nikki Simms , Kim Huffstetler and Heather Popa
Defendant:
Northport Health Services Of Arkansas, L.L.C., NHS Management, L.L.C., J. Norman Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
