Cases 61 - 70 of 148
Stokes v. Whatley et al
as 4:2016cv00696
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stokes
Defendant:
Monty Whatley and Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stokes v. USA
as 6:2016cv03358
Respondent:
USA
Movant:
Kenneth Gaylord Stokes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stokes et al v. Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners et al
as 4:2016cv00843
Defendant:
Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, Michael Rader, Leland Shurin and others
Plaintiff:
Neriah Marie Lee Stokes and Narene James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Thompson
as 4:2016cv01165
Plaintiff:
Marvin Stokes
Defendant:
Wally Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Thole, et al v. U.S. Bank, National Assn., et al
as 16-1928
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James J. Thole and Sherry Smith, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. Bank, National Association, individually and as successor in interest to FAF Advisors, Inc., U.S. Bancorp, Nuveen Asset Management, LLC, as successor in interest to FAF Advisors, Inc. and others
Terrell v. First Student Management, LLC et al
as 4:2016cv00481
Plaintiff:
Essie Terrell , Ethelyn Merriman , Vanessa Harrington and others
Defendant:
First Student Management, LLC and First Student, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938
Stokes v. White
as 4:2016cv03027
Plaintiff:
Michael Tee Stokes, Sr.
Defendant:
Scott White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edwards et al v. Whatley et al
as 4:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Jeffery L Edwards and Anthony Stokes
Defendant:
Monty Whatley and Union Pacific Railroad
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Stokes v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00434
Petitioner:
Willie Frank Stokes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Nathan Cohen, Sr. v. Daniel Devereaux, et al
as 15-3401
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nathan S. Cohen, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel Devereaux, Michael D. Stokes and Robert E. Fearber
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
