Cases 71 - 80 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00885
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00886
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Whitehead v. Clinton et al
as 4:2011cv04031
Plaintiff:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant:
William Jefferson Clinton, George W. Bush, Barrack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. The United States Marshal Service et al
as 5:2010cv05163
Plaintiff:
James Clayton Solomon
Defendant:
The United States Marshal Service, Hunter Petray, Keith Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Cheyenne County et al
as 7:2010cv05009
Defendant:
Cheyenne County, James Collins, Beth Fiegenschuh and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Rankin v. Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office et al
as 6:2010cv02021
Plaintiff:
Max Rankin
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Police Station, Unknown Officer 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankin v. Tingle et al
as 4:2009cv00372
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rankin
Defendant:
Brian Tingle and Kevin Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rankin v. Tingle et al
as 1:2009cv00135
Plaintiff:
Joseph Rankin
Defendant:
Brian Tingle and Kevin Parker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Roderick Rankin v. Larry Norris
as 09-2858
Petitioner - Appellee:
Roderick Leshun Rankin
Respondent - Appellant:
Larry Norris, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Timothy Rankins v. Crawford County Jail, et al
as 09-2446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Timothy Duane Rankins
Defendant - Appellee:
Crawford County Jail, Phelps County Sheriff's Department, John Doe, #1 through #4 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
