Cases 71 - 80 of 487
Badger v. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Craytonia Badger
Defendant:
Anthony Jackson, Gaylon Lay, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong v. Vandergriff
as 4:2022cv00525
Petitioner:
Joshua K. Armstrong
Respondent:
David Vandergriff
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Armstrong v. Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2022cv00073
Plaintiff:
Sherry Armstrong
Defendant:
Nationwide General Insurance Company and Nationwide Property and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Armstrong v. Does
as 4:2022cv00107
Plaintiff:
Amy Armstrong
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sliger v. AG Solutions Group, LLC et al
as 8:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Sliger
Defendant:
AG Solutions Group, LLC doing business as Riggins AG Equipment, AG Solutions Group, LLC., AG Solutions, Inc. and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Frontier Cooperative and Riverport Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Wrongful Death
Causey v. Cowell et al
as 3:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Douglas Eugene Causey
Defendant:
Billy Cowell, Shelia K Armstrong, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burns v McDonough et al
as 0:2021cv02549
Defendant:
Theressa Burns, Department of VA, Secretary Denis McDonough and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704
Armstrong v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2021cv04209
Plaintiff:
Shawn Armstrong
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1396
United States v. Breon Armstrong
as 21-3769
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Breon Raquon Armstrong
Armstrong v. Payne
as 4:2021cv00871
Plaintiff:
Matthew Armstrong
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
