Cases 81 - 90 of 3,929
United States v. Anthony Unocic
as 24-1057
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Anthony Unocic
Angela Richardson v. Susan Townsend, et al
as 24-1059
Plaintiff:
Angela Schuncey Richardson
Defendant:
Susan Townsend, Investigator, Internal Affair Division, Pine Bluff Central Office and Anthony Jackson, Deputy Warden, Pine Bluff Central Office
Lasich v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00059
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lasich
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Collins v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Anthony Collins
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Schmitt v. Rebertus et al
as 0:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Anthony Schmitt
Defendant:
Jolene Rebertus and Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lamar v. Randle et al
as 4:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Anthony D Lamar
Defendant:
Kenyon Randle, Todd Ball, Joe Profiri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tashonda Troupe v. St. Louis County, Missouri, et al
as 24-1036
Plaintiff:
Tashonda Troupe, individually and, on behalf of Lamar Catchings, deceased
Defendant:
Anthony Young, in his individual capacity, St. Louis County, Missouri, Julia Murphy, in her indivdual and offical capacities and others
Aaron Flemons v. Emma Hatchett, et al
as 24-1031
Plaintiff:
Aaron Anthony Flemons
Defendant:
Emma Hatchett, Health Services Administrator, Tracy Bennett, APRN, Medical Care Provider, Hays, Medical Care Provider and others
Dunlap v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
David Anthony Dunlap
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
