Cases 81 - 90 of 102
Keefe v. Social Security Administration et al
as 3:2010cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Keefe
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Illinois Lottery, Cook County, Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassidy v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 4:2010cv00828
Plaintiff:
Theresa Cassidy
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , Wyeth LLC , Solvay Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Loch et al v. Litchfield, City of et al
as 0:2010cv02153
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Jared Loch and Saara Loch
Defendant:
Litchfield, City of and Travis Rueckert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vincent Lee v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-1966
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Vincent X. Lee
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Kay Cassidy, I. Sheehau and others
Roberts et al v. James et al
as 3:2010cv00092
Plaintiff:
Cassidy Roberts , Rhodes Roberts , Brad Cornelison and others
Defendant:
Philip James, Kurt James and Walter Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blakey v. Dormire et al
as 2:2010cv04082
Plaintiff:
Jackie Dewayne Blakey
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Arthur Woods, Jay Cassidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cassidy v. Pfizer Inc. et al DO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2010cv01476
Plaintiff:
Theresa Cassidy
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc., Wyeth LLC, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Scott, Sr. v. Dave Dormire, et al
as 10-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James M. Scott, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
Dave Dormire, Arthur Woods, Larry Crawford and others
Berardi et al v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 0:2009cv03294
Plaintiff:
Concetta Berardi, Concetta Berardi, Concetta Berardi and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Lee v. Dormire et al
as 2:2010cv04005
Plaintiff:
Vincent X Lee
Defendant:
Dave Dormire, Kay Cassidy, Sheehau and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
