Cases 81 - 90 of 165
Petty v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 3:2014cv03127
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Petty
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lott Johnson v. Tom Vilsack, et al
as 14-3501
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lott Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Labor, Mark Petty, Linda Newkirk and others
Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Petty v. Stovall et al
as 4:2014cv04119
Plaintiff:
Justin H. Petty
Defendant:
Ron Stovall, Warden Brazell, Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Valley Forge Insurance Company et al v. Turnbow et al
as 3:2014cv05106
Plaintiff:
Valley Forge Insurance Company and Continental Casualty Company
Defendant:
Jason Turnbow, John Smentowski III, Dustin Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Washia v. Petty,
as 4:2014cv00737
Petitioner:
Gary Washia, Sr
Respondent:
Jim Petty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Petty v. Cook et al
as 3:2014cv00174
Plaintiff:
Tyler Scott Petty
Defendant:
Duke Baily, Dale Cook, Clayborn Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott Johnson v. Tom Vilsack
as 14-2572
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Lott Johnson
Defendant - Appellee:
Tom Vilsack, Secretary, United States Department of Labor
Defendant:
John and Jane Does, Mark Petty, Linda Newkirk and others
Petty v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2014cv02351
Plaintiff:
Patricia S. Petty
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chawich v. Cook et al
as 3:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Khaldoun Chawich
Defendant:
Dale Cook , Clayborn Hicks , Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doyle v. Pettis County et al
as 2:2014cv04144
Plaintiff:
Justin L. Doyle
Defendant:
Pettis County Sheriff's Department and Pettis County MO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
