Cases 1 - 10 of 54
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00066
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Henley v. Neessen Chevrolet, Inc. et al
as 0:2024cv00195
Defendant:
Automotive Restyling Concepts, Inc. doing business as Drive Appeal formerly known as AC Motors formerly known as Automotive Concepts, Neessen Chevrolet, Inc., AC Motors and others
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Henley
Other:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company
Cross Defendant:
Automotive Restyling Concepts, Inc. and BB Motor Sales, LLC
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32701 Odometer Requirments Act
Cross v. Cross et al
as 3:2023cv00126
Plaintiff:
Melissa Moody Cross
Defendant:
Katrina Richardson Cross, Does Human Society, Administrator of DHS and Randall Henley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Henley v. Rardin
as 0:2023cv00262
Petitioner:
Dominic T. Henley
Respondent:
J. Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
LNU et al v. Milliman
as 6:2022cv03329
Plaintiff:
Lily LNU, Sarah LNU, Sierra LNU and others
Defendant:
Michael Milliman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Heredia v. Fallis et al
as 4:2022cv00385
Plaintiff:
Cristobal P Heredia
Defendant:
Johnathan Fallis, Kenneth J Keough, Cody Drake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henley v. MHM Support Services
as 4:2022cv00109
Plaintiff:
Laura Copeland Henley
Defendant:
MHM Support Services
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Henley v. Kallis
as 0:2021cv02255
Petitioner:
Dominic T. Henley
Respondent:
Warden Steve Kallis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Givan v. Henley et al
as 3:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Yul Givan
Defendant:
Henley, Boltz, Malissa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henley v. Kallis et al
as 0:2021cv01440
Plaintiff:
Dominic T. Henley
Defendant:
Steve Kallis, Ian Connors and Barb Von Blanokensee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
