Cases 1 - 10 of 10,021
New Prime, Inc. v. Johnson et al
as 6:2024cv03155
Plaintiff:
New Prime, Inc. a Nebraska corporation doing business as Prime Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas D Johnson, Jr. and Frank E Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Petition for Indemnity
Johnson v. Lew et al
as 0:2024cv01858
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Daniel K. Lew, State of Minnesota Sixth Judicial District Public Defender and Center for Changing Lives
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rickie Tigue, Jr. v. Moses Jackson, et al
as 24-2029
Plaintiff:
Rickie Lynn Tigue, Jr.
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Johnson, Warden, EARU, Brickey's Max, Allison, Major, EARU, Brickey's Max and others
Rogers v. Hughes et al
as 2:2024cv02063
Plaintiff:
Christopher Rogers
Defendant:
Sheriff Tom Hughes and Johnson County, Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chakotay Johnson v. Mark Zuckerberg
as 24-1999
Plaintiff:
Chakotay Bobbie James Johnson
Defendant:
Mark Zuckerberg, Facebook Meta; Facebook.com
Justin Johnson v. Jacob Schurman, et al
as 24-2002
Plaintiff:
Justin Johnson
Defendant:
Jacob Schurman, in his individual capacity only and Christopher Taylor, in his individual capacity only
Johnson v. Milstead et al
as 4:2024cv04094
Petitioner:
Darrian Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Mike Milstead and The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01709
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Johnson
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Johnson v. Dr. Moose et al
as 6:2024cv03140
Plaintiff:
Wayne Thomas Johnson
Defendant:
Dr. Moose and Nurse Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Fredrick Hines v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 24-1970
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Dewayne Hines
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, County of Washington, City of Stillwater and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
