Cases 1 - 10 of 701
Johns v. United States of America et al
as 0:2024cv01892
Plaintiff:
Nicole Johns
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of Interior, Indian Bureau of Affairs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Griffin v. USA DO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2024cv01563
Petitioner:
Bryant Duane Griffin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
United States v. Jonathon Bryant
as 24-1812
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jonathon Bryant, Originally named Jonathan Henry Bryant
United States v. Jonathon Bryant
as 24-1718
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jonathon Bryant
Hopper v. Chancey et al
as 2:2024cv02040
Plaintiff:
Danny Hopper
Defendant:
Deputy Brandon Chancey, Former Prosecutor Rinda Baker, Prosecutor Kevin Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Cynthia L. Bryant and Cynthia L Bryant
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Bryant v. North American Security Inc
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Phillip Bryant
Defendant:
North American Security Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Bey v. Szabad et al
as 4:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
Ali Ali Bey
Defendant:
Richard Szabad, Bryant Police Department and Tre Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Abercombie et al v. Integon National Insurance Company
as 4:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gregory Abercombie, Bryant Williams and Darius Calhoun
Defendant:
Integon National Insurance Company and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv05009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
