Cases 1 - 10 of 3,532
Logan v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04052
Petitioner:
Shatina Ann Logan
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vance v. Shirbroun et al
as 3:2024cv03022
Plaintiff:
Dezrien Vance
Defendant:
Darrell Shirbroun and Anne M Sheeley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tix v. Tix
as 0:2024cv01824
Plaintiff:
Kristin Ann Tix
Defendant:
Robert William Tix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mathis V. FCA US LLC
as 4:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
Katie Ann Mathis and FCA US LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Mills v. Precythe et al
as 4:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Desmond Arnez Mills
Defendant:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bret Healy v. Supreme Court of SD, et al
as 24-1996
Plaintiff:
Bret Healy and Healy Ranch Partnership
Defendant:
Supreme Court of South Dakota, Healy Ranch Inc., Mary Ann Osborne and others
Logan v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Shatina Ann Logan
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jana Tallant, Chief Deputy Joey Davis, APRN Joan McClean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Principal Life Insurance Company v. Billmaier et al
as 4:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Principal Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Nathan Billmaier, Kimberly Ann Conner, Kay Annette Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Interpleader Action
Ross v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02055
Plaintiff:
Melissa Ann Ross
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Wickstrom v. O'Malley
as 0:2024cv01582
Plaintiff:
Bridie Anne Wickstrom
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
