Cases 1 - 10 of 161
Putney v. Huntsman et al
as 1:2024cv01021
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Tad Huntsman, Frank Spain, Prosecuting Attorney Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Huntsman et al
as 4:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Stedrick L Putney, Sr
Defendant:
Tad Huntsman, Frank Spain, Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Putney v. Ross et al
as 1:2024cv01017
Plaintiff:
Stedrick Levelee Putney, Sr. and Stedrick Levelle Putney, Sr.
Defendant:
Circuit Judge Quincey Ross, Tad Huntsman, Prosecuting Attorney Sandra Bradshaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradshaw v. Garrett
as 2:2023cv00170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bradshaw
Defendant:
Doe and Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Williams v. Passafiume et al
as 4:2023cv00730
Plaintiff:
Dalton Williams
Defendant:
Audrianna Passafiume, Cornelia Lasker, Dana Albertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2023cv03162
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Bradshaw Family Trust Inc. v. Twin City Fire Insurance Co.
as 23-1807
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Bradshaw Family Trust Inc., doing business as Hunton Office Supply Inc.
Defendant / Appellee:
Twin City Fire Insurance Company
Christopher Bradshaw v. United States
as 23-1630
Petitioner:
Christopher Lamont Bradshaw
Respondent:
United States of America
Bradshaw v. United States of America
as 3:2023cv03003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamont Bradshaw
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
