Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Brantley et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01194
Plaintiff:
Linda Brantley and Walter Brantley
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Heatlhcare, Inc.
Klapp et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv01485
Plaintiff:
Adam Klapp, Charles Kinnard, Darrius Pearson and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Kono et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
Casey Kono, David Velasquez, Jonathan Griffith and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Payton et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv00362
Plaintiff:
Alana Payton, Cole M. Radicic, Matthew Whelihan and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Hollis v. Drew County Circuit Court et al
as 4:2022cv00654
Plaintiff:
Kerry Rae'lond Hollis
Defendant:
Drew County Circuit Court, Ellen B Brantley and Barbara Wright-Langhammer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Helm v. Lookingbill et al
as 3:2021cv03035
Defendant:
Lieutenant Herren, Nurse Kauffman, Captain Lookingbill and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Hartley Helm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lundy v. Brantley et al
as 3:2020cv03077
Defendant:
Deputy Diaz, Sergeant Dean, Deputy Brantley and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lundy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brantley v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
as 0:2020cv02088
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Plaintiff:
Kristine Brantley
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Shim et al v. ADT LLC et al
as 4:2020cv01009
Defendant:
ADT LLC doing business as ADT Security Services, Timothy Brantley, Dylan Bickings and others
Plaintiff:
Jong Hee Shim doing business as Shim's Diamond Company and Jung Shim doing business as Shim's Diamond Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brantley v. Billy Randall Machen DDS PA et al
as 4:2020cv00502
Plaintiff:
Joycelyn Brantley
Defendant:
Billy Randall Machen and Billy Randall Machen DDS PA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
