Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Schneider v. Corson County Sheriff's Office
as 1:2024cv01005
Plaintiff:
Justin James Schneider
Defendant:
Corson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Dunn et al v. Penfield et al
as 5:2023cv05025
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Bryant et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02188
Plaintiff:
Brian Burtsfield, Bradley Wade Caraviello, Keith Collins and others
Defendant:
Aearo, LLC, 3M Company, Does 1-50 and others
Nelson v. Halvorson
as 0:2017cv01444
Petitioner:
Leland Ronald Nelson, II
Defendant:
Kathy Halvorson and Brett Allyn Corson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson et al v. City of Hazelwood et al
as 4:2014cv01311
Plaintiff:
Henrietta Johnson , Michael Robinson and C.B.
Defendant:
City of Hazelwood , Edwin G. Calstrom , Carl Wolf and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
LaTasha Johnson , A.D.J. , A.T.J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. City of Hazelwood et al
as 4:2014cv00286
Plaintiff:
LaTasha Johnson , A.D.J. , A.T.J. and others
Defendant:
City of Hazelwood, Hazelwood Police Department, Norman Mars and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William H. Otis v. Harold A. Berge, et al
as 11-1588
Plaintiff - Appellant:
William H. Otis
Defendant - Appellee:
Harold A. Berge, Rose M. Berge, Cindy Lou Berge and others
Otis v. Berge et al
as 0:2010cv02155
Plaintiff:
William H. Otis
Defendant:
Harold A. Berge, Rose M. Berge, Cindy Lou Berge and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
