Cases 1 - 10 of 143
Tom Conley, et al v. City of West Des Moines, et al
as 24-1614
Plaintiff:
Tom Conley and Conley Group, Inc.
Defendant:
City of West Des Moines, Cherry Renee Hardman, in her individual and official capacities, Matthew McKinney, in his individual and official capacities and others
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherry, Jr v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Manuel Cherry Jr. and Manuel Cherry, Jr
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Cherry Creek Mortgage, LLC
as 0:2023cv02831
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Cherry Creek Mortgage, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Allen et al v. 3M Company
as 0:2023cv02634
Plaintiff:
Zackerie Allen, Nicholas Amatuzzo, Edwin Among and others
Defendant:
3M Company
Allison et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02179
Plaintiff:
Brandon J. Allison, Shane P. Anderson, William R. Baumer and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies LLC
Pratt v. Govan
as 1:2023cv01037
Plaintiff:
Barry Pratt, Jr and Barry Michael Pratt, Jr.
Defendant:
Cherry Govan and Circuit Clerk Cherry Govan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
O'Hara v. Lott et al
as 4:2023cv00442
Plaintiff:
Omar O'Hara
Defendant:
Terrence Lott and Marlissa Butler-Cherry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Conley et al v. City of West Des Moines, Iowa et al
as 4:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Tom Conley and Conley Group, Inc.
Defendant:
City of West Des Moines, Iowa, Cherry Renee Hardman, Matthew McKinney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
