Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Nicholas Addison v. William Straughn, et al
as 17-1028
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Nicholas Cortez Addison
Defendant - Appellee:
William Straughn, Warden, Cummins Unit (originally named as Straughn), Louis E. Cogbill, Mental Health Dr., Cummins Unit (originally named as Cosgsbill), Sheila R. Johnson, Sergeant, Cummins Unit (originally named as Shelia Johny) and others
Addison v. Straughn et al
as 5:2016cv00004
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Addison
Defendant:
Straughn, Cogsbill, Shelia Johny and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Pipkin et al
as 4:2015cv00476
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D Stevens
Defendant:
Richard Pipkin, John Doe, Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Brown et al
as 5:2015cv05114
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
J.A. Brown, Christopher Fields and Crutchfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Bryant et al
as 6:2015cv03160
Plaintiff:
Ryan Antonio Lewis
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bryant, Philip Fuhrman, Jonathan David Barker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 5:2015cv05015
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimmy Stevens v. Deputy Robinson, et al
as 15-1058
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Tim Helder, Aramark, Co., Inc., Quorum Court and others
Defendant:
Major Randell Dinger
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 4:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers and John Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Vickers et al
as 3:2014cv03091
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
Roger Vickers, John Doe #1 & #2, Quorum Court of Marion County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stevens v. Brown et al
as 5:2014cv05300
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Defendant:
J.A. Brown, Chris Fields, K. Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
