Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Langhorn v. Stuttgart Police Department
as 2:2025cv00040
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deshawn Langhorn
Defendant:
Stuttgart Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Langhorn v. Gilean et al
as 2:2025cv00039
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deshawn Langhorn
Defendant:
Jordan Gilean, Jeremiah Odell, Tyran McCraic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Misters v. Bolin
as 0:2025cv00531
Petitioner:
Jerome Deshawn Misters
Respondent:
William Bolin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Baker et al
as 4:2025cv00012
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, DeShawn Thomas, Douangkesone and others
Plaintiff:
Neiman Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hunt v. Behnke et al
as 4:2024cv01137
Defendant:
Trenton Behnke, Does Unknown Task Force Officers, Federal Bureau of Investigations, Josh Hubbard and others
Plaintiff:
Marquis Deshawn Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Leonard Boyd
as 24-2994
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Leonard Deshawn Boyd
Uwazurike et al v. State of Iowa et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Eyioma Uwazurike, Noah Shannon, Nelson Brands and others
Defendant:
State of Iowa, Iowa Department of Public Safety, Iowa Division of Criminal Investigation (DCI) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 vp Violation of Due Process and Equal Protection
United States v. Cazmiere Graves
as 24-1613
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Cazmiere Deshawn Graves
Sanders v. Keypers LLC et al
as 4:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
Deshawn Sanders
Defendant:
Keypers LLC and Robert Dawes
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Conwell v. Does
as 4:2023cv00438
Plaintiff:
DeShawn Raymond Conwell
Defendant:
John and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
