Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Hill v. 3M Company
as 0:2022cv02614
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Hill
Defendant:
3M Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Thomas v. Volkman et al
as 4:2022cv00151
Plaintiff:
David Thomas
Defendant:
Volkman, J Lingo, Ryals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv02148
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00076
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Bowers v. Tension International, Inc
as 4:2016cv00562
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Bowers
Defendant:
Tension International, Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Hueser v. Syngenta Corporation et al
as 0:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Hueser
Defendant:
Syngenta Corporation , Syngenta Seeds, Inc. , Syngenta Biotechnology, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garner et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp. et al
as 0:2014cv03073
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Garner, Sr and Suzanne Garner
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corp., Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Yarber v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2013cv00116
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Yarber
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
American Family Mutual Insurance Company v. France et al
as 0:2010cv04736
Plaintiff:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Jennifer France, Karen Thomas and David Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mack Green, et al v. SuperShuttle International, et al
as 10-3310
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mack Green, Robynne Barber, Michael Kennedy and others
Defendant - Appellee:
SuperShuttle International, Inc., SuperShuttle Franchise Corporation and SuperShuttle of Minnesota, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
