Cases 1 - 10 of 494
Dunn v. State of Arkansas
as 1:2024cv01081
Petitioner:
Larry Dunn
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunn et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 6:2024cv06137
Plaintiff:
Linda Kay Waymack and Lorri Dunn
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Dunn v. Hackney et al
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Robert V Dunn
Defendant:
Barbara Hackney and Danielle Lancaster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunn v. USA
as 0:2024cv03323
Petitioner:
Darnell Andre Dunn
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Williams v. Dunn et al
as 4:2024cv00615
Plaintiff:
Larry Edmond Williams
Defendant:
Chris Wieland, Kimberly Dunn, Karvarious Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Croft et al v. Ascension Health
as 4:2024cv00870
Plaintiff:
Donald Pitchers, Tiffany Farrand, Cheryl Hayes and others
Defendant:
Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Finley v. McCormick et al
as 6:2024cv06057
Plaintiff:
Jaime Glenn Finley and Possum
Defendant:
Sheriff Mike McCormick, Joel Ware, Chief S. Elrod and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01428
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jeremy Dunn, et al v. Shane Penfield, et al
as 24-1804
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dunn and Kevin Love
Defendant:
Shane Penfield, in his official and individual capacities, Penfield Law Firm Professional LLC, Marty Jackley, in his individual capacity and others
Darden v. Luechtefeld et al
as 4:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Dominique Deangelo Darden
Defendant:
Debra Luechtefeld, Kyle Clinkingbeard, Valerie Huhn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
