Cases 1 - 10 of 1,501
Wardlow v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Tony Eugene Wardlow
Defendant:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Burford v. Guardian Life Insurance Company
as 0:2024cv02263
Plaintiff:
Eugene Burford
Defendant:
Guardian Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Day v. Foley et al
as 2:2024cv04094
Plaintiff:
Lewis Eugene Day
Defendant:
Trevor Foley and Julie Kempker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beadle v. Rardin
as 0:2024cv02045
Petitioner:
Jack Eugene Beadle
Respondent:
Jared Rardin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hale v. Karas Correctional Health (KCH) et al
as 5:2024cv05117
Plaintiff:
Michael Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Karas Correctional Health (KCH), Sheriff Jay Cantrell, Paramedic Dustin Sanders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ledkins v. Jackson et al
as 3:2024cv03027
Plaintiff:
Paul Eugene Ledkins
Defendant:
Mayor Jerry Jackson, Jeremy Ragland, Mitch Magness and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Washington v. Minnesota DOC, et al
as 24-1962
Plaintiff:
Keith Eugene Washington, also known as Monroe Bernard Washington
Defendant:
Minnesota Department of Corrections, Supervisor Officials, sued in their individual capacities, MCF Oak Park Heights, MCF Stillwater and others
Roybal et al v. Schnell
as 0:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
Kristopher Lee Roybal, Native American Practitioners of their Religious Beliefs confined at M.C.F. Stillwater, the, Lance Lee Houle and others
Defendant:
Paul Schnell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eugene Perkins v. Derrick Frye
as 24-1907
Plaintiff:
Eugene Perkins
Defendant:
Derrick Frye, Police Officer, Individual and Official Capacity
United States v. Montez Brown
as 24-1892
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Montez Brown, also known as Tez Blood, also known as Montez Eugene Brown
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
