Cases 1 - 10 of 42
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Banerjee v. Job Service North Dakota et al
as 3:2023cv00102
Plaintiff:
Joyanta Banerjee
Defendant:
Job Service North Dakota and Unemployment Insurance Benefit Section Office
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1882
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Job Creators Network, et al v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 21-3491
Petitioner:
Job Creators Network, Independent Bakers Association, Lawrence Transportation Company and others
Respondent:
U.S. Department of Labor, Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration and others
Shannon Miller v. Jessica Zieger, et al
as 21-3069
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Shannon Louise Miller
Defendant / Appellee:
Jessica Zieger, Gateway Corp Program Supervisor, Kyra Hainey, Gateway Corp Program Supervisor, Amy Gertz, Functional Unit Manager and others
Miller v. Zieger et al
as 5:2021cv06046
Defendant:
Fields, Nickels, Jessica Zieger and others
Plaintiff:
Shannon Louise Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. CO1 et al
as 4:2020cv01733
Defendant:
ERDCC, MODOC, Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Engel v. CO1 et al
as 4:2020cv01684
Defendant:
Sargent's Job Custody, Unknown Corizon Supervisor, Unknown Superintendent and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Devon Engel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMillen v. Job Service North Dakota
as 2:2020cv04080
Defendant:
Job Service North Dakota
Plaintiff:
Natasha McMillen
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
