Cases 1 - 10 of 1,723
Biggs v. King
as 0:2024cv03672
Petitioner:
Donald Courtney Biggs
Respondent:
King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Hernandez-Medina v. King
as 0:2024cv03617
Respondent:
Mark King
Petitioner:
Marco Antonio Hernandez-Medina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Franks v. Perry et al
as 2:2024cv02115
Defendant:
Deputy Zachary King, John Doe Officers, Chief of Police Josh Winford and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Franks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hirth et al v. Iowa Utilities Commission et al
as 6:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Charles City Area Development Corporation, Free Soil Foundation, Van Diest Family, LLC and others
Defendant:
Summit Carbon Solutions, LLC, Joshua Byrnes, Sarah Martz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358 Land Condemnation
Trail King Industries, Inc.
as 4:2024cv04164
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Trail King Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Excise Tax
Calzone King, LLC v. Midwest Dough Guys, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00335
Plaintiff:
Calzone King, LLC
Defendant:
Nickolas Rowan, Cory Rowan, Midwest Dough Guys, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
King v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv00330
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Office of General Counsel Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Cadero Daniel King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Williams v. King et al
as 4:2024cv04087
Plaintiff:
Damont Andre Williams
Defendant:
Nurse King and Officer Hartley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Straughn et al
as 2:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
Jerry J Ellis
Defendant:
C Smith, Roosevelt Barden, Gaylon Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Christopher King
as 24-2637
Defendant:
Christopher King
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
