Cases 1 - 10 of 363
Logan v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04052
Petitioner:
Shatina Ann Logan
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Logan v. Tallant et al
as 4:2024cv04039
Plaintiff:
Shatina Ann Logan
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Jana Tallant, Chief Deputy Joey Davis, APRN Joan McClean and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Christopher Meadows
as 24-1937
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Christopher Logan Meadows
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00318
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Williamson v. State of North Dakota et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Robert Williamson
Defendant:
State of North Dakota, Chad Pringle, Dave Krabbenhoft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stump v. Nebraska, buffalo county court
as 8:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Logan Everett Stump
Defendant:
Nebraska, buffalo county court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Logan v. St. Louis University
as 4:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Dawn M. Logan
Defendant:
St. Louis University doing business as Saint Louis University
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Woods v. City of St. Ann, Missouri et al
as 4:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Michelle Woods
Defendant:
City of St. Ann, Missouri, Aaron Jimenez, Stefan Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. Green et al
as 2:2024cv02018
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Defendant:
Vanessa Green, Attorney John Alford, Attorney Matthew R. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
