Cases 1 - 10 of 3,130
Miller v. Miller
as 4:2024cv00785
Plaintiff:
Matthew W. Miller
Defendant:
Lynn A. Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cooney v. Wilson et al
as 4:2024cv00478
Plaintiff:
Krishonn Cooney
Defendant:
Chad Wilson, Matthew Tucker and Kelton Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Despain v. Trojan Hose and Supply, Inc et al
as 5:2024cv06074
Plaintiff:
Angelique Despain
Defendant:
Trojan Hose and Supply, Inc, Trojan Rental and Matthew Reibe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ralston v. Jones et al
as 5:2024cv05082
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Wayne Ralston
Defendant:
Judge Casey Jones, Judge Mark Lindsay, Corey Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Moore v. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Douglas Matthew Moore
Defendant:
Department of Corrections and Newton Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kalombo v. Matthew et al
as 0:2024cv01980
Plaintiff:
Pierre Kalombo
Defendant:
Matthew and Kandiyohi County Jail, the
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanders et al v. Pettis County, Missouri et al
as 2:2024cv04045
Plaintiff:
Cassie Sanders, Matthew Sanders and Ayden Mitchell Sanders
Defendant:
Pettis County, Missouri, Pettis County Sheriffs Deputy Gooch, Pettis County Sheriffs Deputy Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Barefield v. Conway et al
as 4:2024cv00292
Plaintiff:
Keya Deonte Barefield
Defendant:
Cynthia Conway, Joseph Mahoney, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthews v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01884
Plaintiff:
Julie Matthews
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
