Cases 1 - 10 of 398
Palmer et al v. United States of America
as 4:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Courtney Palmer and Shaunta Bradford
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Dunahue v. Jackson et al
as 4:2024cv00227
Plaintiff:
Reginald Dunahue
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, Dexter Payne, William Straughn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adam Keup v. Sarpy County, et al
as 24-1114
Plaintiff:
Adam Keup
Defendant:
Sarpy County, Jeff Davis, Sarpy County Sheriff, in his official and individual capacities, Jane or John Doe, Deputies, 1-4, in their individual capacities as employees of Sarpy County and others
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3752
Plaintiff:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Palmer v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv03523
Plaintiff:
Pamela S. Palmer
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Terry Lee v. Kevin Patterson, et al
as 23-3420
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Terry Antonio Lee
Defendant / Appellee:
Kevin Patterson, Lt., Tucker Max, Mariquse McCan, Sgt., Tucker Max, Cierra Washington, Sgt. and others
Reginald Dunahue v. William Straughn, et al
as 23-3221
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Reginald L. Dunahue
Defendant / Appellee:
William F. Straughn, Deputy Director, ADC, Maurice Culclager, Warden, Brickeys, ADC, C. Johnson, Assistant Warden, Brickeys Max, ADC and others
Palmer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv02891
Plaintiff:
David Palmer and Donnis Palmer
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Palmer v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
Amanda M. Palmer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
