Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Wyatt v. Young et al
as 4:2020cv04184
Petitioner:
Jason R. Wyatt
Respondent:
The Attorney General of the State of South Dakota and Darren Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Burford v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2016cv00536
Plaintiff:
Kent N Burford , Mark Downs , Randall G. Emmons and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company , Solutia Inc. and Pharmacia LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Cody Walton v. Robert Dawson, et al
as 12-4039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cody Lee Walton
Defendant:
Robert Dawson, Jon Dwiggins, Nathaniel Eugene Flennory and others
Defendant - Appellee:
David Moore
Cody Walton v. Robert Dawson, et al
as 12-4000
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Cody Lee Walton
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Dawson and David Moore
Defendant:
Jon Dwiggins, Nathaniel Eugene Flennory, Drew Belt and others
Flennory v. Dawson et al
as 2:2012cv00090
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Eugene Flennory
Defendant:
Robert Dawson, David Moore, Alan R. Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wyatt v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 3:2012cv03055
Plaintiff:
Timothy R. Wyatt
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Scott v. Moore et al
as 4:2012cv00653
Defendant:
David Moore, Robert Dawson, Michael Shively and others
Plaintiff:
Adam James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Moore et al
as 2:2012cv00031
Defendant:
David Moore, Robert Dawson, Michael Shively and others
Plaintiff:
Adam James Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flennory v. Dawson et al
as 2:2012cv00027
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Eugene Flennory
Defendant:
Robert Dawson, David Moore, Alan R Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flennory v. Dawson et al
as 2:2012cv04080
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Eugene Flennory
Defendant:
Robert Dawson, David Moore, Alan R. Wyatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
