Cases 1 - 10 of 27
McCurley v. Jones
as 4:2023cv00882
Plaintiff:
Jesse L McCurley
Defendant:
Shane Jones, Leo Young, Dalton Tyner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wanda Tyner v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 23-2015
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Wanda Tyner
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Foam Holdings Inc v. Creative Foam Products LLC et al
as 4:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
Foam Holdings Inc doing business as Alleguard
Defendant:
Creative Foam Products LLC and Charles Tyner
Counter Defendant:
Foam Holdings Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
Willis v. Tyner et al
as 4:2023cv00142
Plaintiff:
Louis Jacob Willis
Defendant:
Richard Reyes Tyner, Schneider National, Inc., Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tyner et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
as 0:2022cv01880
Plaintiff:
Roland Tyner and Cheryl Tyner
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics doing business as Stryker Orthopaedics, Stryker Corp., Stryker Sales Corporation and others
Wanda Tyner v. DST Systems, Inc.
as 21-3946
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Wanda Tyner
Defendant / Appellant:
DST Systems, Inc.
Wolf Guts v. Kruegger et al
as 4:2021cv04213
Plaintiff:
Richard Wolf Guts
Defendant:
Kruegger, Dr Tyner, Dr Hampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tyner v. DST Systems Inc
as 4:2021cv09134
Plaintiff:
Wanda Tyner
Defendant:
DST Systems Inc
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Hammond v. B.O.P. Springfield, MO et al
as 6:2021cv03131
Defendant:
Forrest City, Arkansas, Judge Unknown Harpool, B.O.P. Springfield, MO and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joseph Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hammond v. B.O.P. Springfield, MO et al
as 4:2021cv00482
Defendant:
Forrest City, Arkansas, Judge Unknown Harpool, B.O.P. Springfield, MO and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Joseph Hammond
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
