Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hess v. Jefferson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Hess and Michael Hess
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Missouri, Dave Marshak, Harvey Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Does
as 2:2022cv00009
Plaintiff:
Timothy Davis, Sr
Defendant:
Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hicks et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02092
Plaintiff:
Curtis Hahn, Amorris Conley, Jonathan Stark and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Davis v. Arkansas County Detention Center
as 5:2016cv00169
Plaintiff:
Timothy Davis, Jr
Defendant:
Arkansas County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Jefferson County, Missouri et al
as 4:2015cv01059
Plaintiff:
Shane Bailey
Defendant:
Jefferson County, Missouri , Timothy Davis , Andrew Godi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallace Gardner v. Timothy Fox, et al
as 14-1963
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Wallace A. Gardner
Defendant - Appellee:
Timothy Davis Fox, Pulaski County Circuit Court Judge, Leigh Patterson, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Pulaski County, Barbara Mariani, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, Pulaski County and others
Gardner v. Fox et al
as 4:2014cv00197
Plaintiff:
Wallace A Gardner
Defendant:
Timothy Davis Fox, Leigh Patterson, Barbara Mariani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Davis v. Ray Hobb
as 13-2052
Petitioner - Appellant:
Timothy Davis
Respondent - Appellee:
Ray Hobbs, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Davis v. Hobbs
as 5:2012cv00421
Plaintiff:
Timothy Davis
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bailey v. Davis et al
as 4:2012cv02016
Plaintiff:
Shane Bailey
Defendant:
Timothy Davis , Andrew Godi , Robert Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
