Cases 91 - 100 of 1,619
Sosaia Sekona v. Alex Villanueva, et al
as 23-55220
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SOSAIA SEKONA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEX VILLANUEVA, Sheriff, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, BARRAZA, Deputy; individual and official capacity and others
Jacinto Sanchez v. L. Bird
as 2:2023cv01702
Petitioner:
Jacinto Sanchez
Respondent:
L Bird
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sanchez v. Pickens et al
as 3:2023cv00089
Plaintiff:
Jasmine Sanchez
Defendant:
Madeline Pickens, Curtis Rigney and Stolk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pedro G. Sanchez v. Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 2:2023cv01672
Plaintiff:
Pedro G. Sanchez
Defendant:
Los Angeles Sheriffs Dept., Sheriff Robert Luna and Los Angeles County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC)Coleman v. Moore et al
as 1:2023cv00324
Plaintiff:
Saahdi Abdul Coleman
Defendant:
Moore, E. McDaniel, Russell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tapia v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00281
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Tapia
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Shinn et al
as 2:2023cv00284
Plaintiff:
Dwain A Ward, Jr.
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Posey, Unknown Bresan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza v. No Named Respondent
as 2:2023cv00048
Petitioner:
Amador Sanchez Mendoza
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jasmine Sanchez v. Chet Rigney, et al
as 23-15168
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JASMINE PAUL SANCHEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
CHET RIGNEY, CURTIS RIGNEY, WILLIAM REUBART and others
(PC) Baker v. County of Alameda et al
as 2:2023cv00249
Plaintiff:
Bobby Baker
Defendant:
County of Alameda and Yesenia Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
