Cases 31 - 40 of 14,850
Purdue #113333 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Jacob J Purdue
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, M Shiro, C Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tholson v. Luper
as 3:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Leon M. Tholson
Defendant:
D. Luper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 2:2024cv01306
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Velasco Perez v. Phillips
as 1:2024cv00554
Petitioner:
Alfonso Velasco Perez
Respondent:
Bryan D. Phillips
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Ford v. Williams
as 1:2024cv00532
Plaintiff:
Marcel D. Ford
Defendant:
Slyvester Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Davis v. Mandrigal et al
as 2:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
Maurice Daronte Davis
Defendant:
Z. Mandrigal, T. Harris, Hamblin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Harper v. Powell et al
as 2:2024cv01279
Plaintiff:
Daniel Harper
Defendant:
B. Powell, S. Arana and D. Caraballo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa #350727 v. Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry et al
as 4:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections Rehabilitation and Reentry, Unknown Parties, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Castro v. Gipson et al
as 3:2024cv00789
Defendant:
Surkhi, Connie Gipson, J. Hill and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Kylm
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Bryan Paul Hernandez
Defendant:
Arthur D Kylm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
