Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Brandon Williams v. Mr. Fumby et al
as 2:2023cv05430
Plaintiff:
Brandon Williams
Defendant:
Mr. Fumby and Ms. Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amerson v. Yavapai County Board of Supervisors et al
as 3:2023cv08069
Plaintiff:
Ronald M Amerson
Defendant:
Yavapai County Board of Supervisors, Yavapai County Sheriff's Office, Unknown Parties and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Daily v. Halbert et al
as 2:2021cv00398
Defendant:
State of Oregon, A.G. Ellen F. Rosenblum, Neistadt and others
Plaintiff:
Darrin Vaughn Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGee v. Daily et al
as 3:2020cv01937
Defendant:
Katheryne Krueger, Charles Mickley and Anne Daily
Plaintiff:
Menphrey McGee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nickerson v. State of Montana et al
as 9:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Ed Corrigan, Jamie Bray, Caitlin Overland and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Phillip Nickerson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daily v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2020cv00173
Defendant:
Jeffrey Uttecht and State of Washington
Petitioner:
Brandon Daily
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Banks et al v. President Trump Articles of Impeachment et al
as 2:2020cv00680
Petitioner:
Prince Harry, Frederick Banks and Meghan Markle
Respondent:
Beforeitsnews.com, Daily Mirror, U.S. Marshals and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Iske v. Daily
as 3:2019cv00761
Defendant:
Sgt. Daily and Sgt. Baily
Plaintiff:
Harlan Iske
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shank v. Corizon Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04638
Defendant:
Adam Perkins, Matthew B Gretzer, Adon Kabongo and others
Plaintiff:
David Shank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Montana State Prison et al
as 2:2018cv00035
Plaintiff:
Jeremy G. Jones
Defendant:
Montana State Prison and Ms. Daily
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
