Cases 1 - 10 of 74
Parker v. State of Montana
as 4:2024cv00041
Petitioner:
James Michael Parker
Respondent:
State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Papazian v. B.M. Trate
as 1:2024cv00392
Petitioner:
James Michael Papazian
Respondent:
B.M. Trate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Bowie v. USA
as 3:2023cv01451
Petitioner:
James Michael Bowie
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Fayed v. Winslow et al
as 4:2023cv01012
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
David Winslow and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Fayed v. Warden San Quentin State Prison
as 22-99010
Petitioner / Appellant:
JAMES MICHAEL FAYED
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
Youpee v. Cantrell et al
as 4:2022cv00048
Petitioner:
James Michael Youpee
Respondent:
Richard Cantrell and Attorney General of the State of Montana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James Michael Fayed v. Gavin Newsom et al
as 2:2022cv01303
Petitioner:
James Michael Fayed
Respondent:
Gavin Newsom, Office of the Attorney General for the State of California and Los Angeles County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fayed v. Newsom et al
as 4:2022cv00970
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
Gavin Newsom, Office of the Attorney General for the State of California and County of Los Angeles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Fayed v. Allison, et al.
as 2:2021cv02141
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison and County of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fayed v. Allison et al
as 4:2021cv08912
Plaintiff:
James Michael Fayed
Defendant:
Warden Kathleen Allison and County of Los Angeles, California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
