Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Michael Foster v. C. Crosby, et al
as 23-15372
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL BARKARRI FOSTER
Defendant / Appellee:
C. CROSBY, (C.O.), J. PUENTE, (SGT), C. PARRY, (Capt.) and others
Foster v. Crosby et al
as 3:2022cv00878
Plaintiff:
Michael Barkarri Foster
Defendant:
C. Crosby, J. Puente, C. Parry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hughes v. Bovencamp et al
as 3:2018cv05717
Defendant:
J Ross, K Henry, K Sawyer and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Wayne Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aplin v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2017cv01142
Plaintiff:
Colby Lee Aplin
Defendant:
J. Bradford, Chief Medical Doctor Gullick, Ashley Clements and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Suen v. State of California et al
as 3:2015cv04020
Plaintiff:
David F. Suen
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, D. Conover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott Cook v. Matthew Cate, et al
as 14-16769
Plaintiff - Appellee:
SCOTT TROY COOK
Defendant - Appellant:
MATTHEW CATE, Current Director of CDCR, F. JUAQUEZ, Current Warden at PBSP, G. D. LEWIS, Previous Warden at PBSP and others
Cook v. Marshall
as 3:2014cv00002
Petitioner:
Kim M. Cook
Respondent:
L. Dean Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cleveland v. Pinal County Superior Court et al
as 2:2012cv01942
Plaintiff:
Christopher Lamar Cleveland
Defendant:
Pinal County Superior Court, State Bar of Arizona, Paula M Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harold Shamburger v. Richard Kirkland, et al
as 12-15841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HAROLD B. SHAMBURGER
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD J. KIRKLAND, T. JOURDEN, G. ATER and others
Irvin Tatum v. T. Puget, et al
as 12-15821
Plaintiff - Appellant:
IRVIN T. TATUM
Defendant - Appellee:
T. PUGET, D. BRADBURY, R. COX and others
Defendant:
D. MARVIN, M. COOK and J. HIRAI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
