Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Bender v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00535
Plaintiff:
Amy Bender
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, David Ewell, Robert Cooley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Tenney et al
as 4:2023cv05163
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
Nancy Tenney, Corey Endo, K. Gallagher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01216
Plaintiff:
Nina Mae Becker
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stoddard v. Washburn et al
as 2:2022cv01978
Plaintiff:
Robert Stoddard
Defendant:
Susan Washburn, Heather Nevil, Crystal L. Cortazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Darnell Israel, Sr. v. Jammie Smith et al
as 5:2022cv01854
Plaintiff:
Darnell Israel, Sr.
Defendant:
Jammie Smith, Nina Smith and Robert Presley Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Becker v. Brnovich
as 2:2022cv01540
Plaintiff:
Nina Mae Becker
Defendant:
Mark Brnovich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zambrano v. Oregon Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Sergio Miguel Zambrano
Defendant:
Oregon Department of Corrections, Oregon Corrections Enterprises, Paula Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ron Bounds v. Donna Byrnes, et al
as 22-35086
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RON BOUNDS
Defendant / Appellee:
DONNA BYRNES, Disciplinary Hearing Officer, KAY HEINRICH, Associate Superintendent, MICHAEL KERR, Counselor - T- Unit and others
Sharp v. Bolin et al
as 3:2021cv07930
Plaintiff:
Anthony A. Sharp
Defendant:
Nina Bolin, Barbara Schaefer and Ursual Dean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
