Cases 1 - 10 of 310
McCrary v. Kotek et al
as 3:2024cv00401
Plaintiff:
Dathan Jude McCrary, Sr
Defendant:
Tina Kotek, Ellen F. Rosenblum, Mike Schmidt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Schmidt et al
as 3:2023cv05890
Plaintiff:
Horace Hill, Jr
Defendant:
Schmidt, Joseph Barnett, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Briah v. Obiero et al
as 3:2023cv00477
Plaintiff:
Raziel Briah
Defendant:
Myque Obiero and Mike Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Miles v. Laursen et al
as 2:2023cv00663
Plaintiff:
Georgia Mills and Georgia Miles
Defendant:
Phillipa Larsen, Judge Ashby, Judge Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillip Carson v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 23-15410
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PHILLIP LEE CARSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, ADOC Director (Retired), RICHARD PRATT, Deputy Director of ADOC, PARKS, CO2 Unknown and others
Ball v. Schmidt
as 6:2022cv00083
Plaintiff:
Reginald K. Ball
Defendant:
Desiree Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Townsel v. Bowman et al
as 4:2022cv05122
Plaintiff:
Jerry U Townsel
Defendant:
Cheryle Strange, Christopher C Bowman, Christopher M Malone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers v. Maxfield et al
as 5:2022cv04935
Plaintiff:
Ferdinand Flowers
Defendant:
Captain April Maxfield, Charm Hedgemark and Jacob Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marques v. Lothman et al
as 3:2022cv08105
Petitioner:
Robert Michael Marques
Respondent:
Kendal Lothman and Derek Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
